El creacionismo -muy poca teoría, todavía menos ciencia y mucha religión- es una de esas tonterías que intentan pasar por serias. Ofrecen argumentos que demuestra un profundo desconocimiento de biología y evolución. Ahora, Scientific American ofrece en plan resumen las respuestas a los 15 argumentos favoritos del creacionismo.
Science & Technology at Scientific American.com: 15 Answers to Creationist Nonsense — Opponents of evolution want to make a place for creationism by tearing down real science, but their arguments don’t hold up
Embarrassingly, in the 21st century, in the most scientifically advanced nation the world has ever known, creationists can still persuade politicians, judges and ordinary citizens that evolution is a flawed, poorly supported fantasy. They lobby for creationist ideas such as «intelligent design» to be taught as alternatives to evolution in science classrooms. As this article goes to press, the Ohio Board of Education is debating whether to mandate such a change. Some antievolutionists, such as Philip E. Johnson, a law professor at the University of California at Berkeley and author of Darwin on Trial, admit that they intend for intelligent-design theory to serve as a «wedge» for reopening science classrooms to discussions of God.
Besieged teachers and others may increasingly find themselves on the spot to defend evolution and refute creationism. The arguments that creationists use are typically specious and based on misunderstandings of (or outright lies about) evolution, but the number and diversity of the objections can put even well-informed people at a disadvantage.
To help with answering them, the following list rebuts some of the most common «scientific» arguments raised against evolution. It also directs readers to further sources for information and explains why creation science has no place in the classroom.